Original standard cost = 0.5 hours × $16 per hour = $8 per unit?
Revised standard = 0.6 hours × $15 per hour = $9 per unit?
Planning and operational variances for labour are calculated in a similar way to planning and operational?variances for materials. We need to look at planning and operational variances for labour rate and labour?efficiency.?
Labour rate planning variance?
This is the difference between the original standard rate per hour and the revised standard rate per hour.?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? $ per hour?
Original standard rate? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?16?
Revised standard rate? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???15?
Labour rate planning variance? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?1 (F)?
The planning variance for labour rate is favourable, because the revised hourly rate is lower than in the?original standard. The variance is converted into a total monetary amount by multiplying the planning?variance per hour by the actual number of hours worked.?
Labour rate planning variance = 8,700 hours × $1 (F) = $8,700 (F).?
Labour efficiency planning variance?
This is the difference between the original standard time per unit and the revised standard time, for the?quantity of units produced. The efficiency planning variance is converted into a total monetary value by?applying the original standard rate per hour, not the revised standard rate.??
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Hours?
14,000 units of product should take: original standard (× 0.5)? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?7,000?
14,000 units of product should take: revised standard (× 0.6)? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 8,400?
Labour efficiency planning variance in hours? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?1,400 (A)?
Original standard rate per hour? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?$16?
Labour efficiency planning variance in $? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?$22,400 (A)?
The planning variance is adverse because the revised standard is for a longer time per unit (so higher cost?and lower profit).?
Labour rate operational variance?
This is calculated using the actual number of hours worked and paid for.?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?$?
8,700 hours should cost (revised standard $15)? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?130,500?
They did cost? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 130,500?
Labour rate operational variance? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0?
In this example, the workforce was paid exactly the revised rate of pay per hour.?
Labour efficiency operational variance?
This variance is calculated by comparing the actual time to make the output units with the standard time in?the revised standard. It is then converted into a monetary value by applying the original standard rate?per hour.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Hours?
14,000 units of product should take (× 0.6 hours)? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?8,400?
They did take? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?8,700?
Labour efficiency (operational variance in hours)? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?300 (A)?
Original standard rate per hour? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? $16?
Labour efficiency (operational variance in $)? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??$4,800 (A)?
The variances may be summarised as follows.??
???????
